Be among the first to use our new Common Ground Scorecard! Before you vote, see how your candidates rate at finding common ground.

How are points earned?

1. Official Performance (30 points)

  1. Legislators: Bipartisan bill sponsorship and co-sponsorship
  2. Executives: Bipartisan job approval
  3. Candidates without congressional or gubernatorial service: Predictive estimate by statistical modeling

2. Personal Actions (30 points)

  1. Public conversation across political differences
  2. Joining an official from the opposing party for a visit of their district
  3. Membership in a common ground focused caucus (Only U.S. House)

3. Communication (20 points +/-)

  1. Promoting common ground (+)
  2. Insulting political opponents (-)

4. Commitments (20 points)

  1. I will identify and set aside personal biases.
  2. I will commit to seek agreement, progress, and solutions.
  3. I will listen first to learn perspectives and experiences.
  4. I will not assume, but seek to understand motives and intentions.
  5. I will seek outcomes all can live with but not compromise principles.
  6. I will accept that good people may disagree.
  7. I will use and accept facts.
  8. I will stay respectful.
  9. I will resist demonizing.
  10. I will de-escalate hostile situations.

5. BONUS: Outstanding Common Grounder (+10 points)

  1. Awarded for common ground behavior or boldly champions common ground.
Get More Details

The Maverick Matrix™ illustrates the degree to which an official seeks common ground relative to the partisan intensity of their constituents, meaning how strongly the area they represent favors one party over the other. The matrix is divided into four labeled quadrants:

  • Balancers: Balancing constituents more closely divided between the parties, this official is more of a Common Grounder.
  • Team Players: Consistent with a constituency strongly leaning toward one party, this official is less of a Common Grounder.
  • True Believers: Despite a constituency more closely divided between the parties, this official is less of a Common Grounder.
  • Mavericks: Despite a constituency strongly leaning toward one party, this official is more of a Common Grounder. Such officials are most commendable in our view.
Get more details

View Map to Search by District or Zip Code

Common Ground Scorecard for: Scott Peters

View by:
Filter by:
Key:

2020 Incumbent

2020 Challenger

Not Up for Reelection in 2020


Click on an individual politician to get more information or click "Compare" beneath the image to compare up to 6 politicians sitewide.

Continue to add politicians to your list or

U.S. House
Compare
57

Scott Peters (CA-52 - D)

Compare
57

Scott Peters (CA-52 - D)

Maverick Matrix

Balancers
Mavericks
True Believers
Team Players
Constituent Partisan Intensity
Common Ground Score

Learn more about how these scores were calculated

Common Ground Score 57Well Above Average

Commentary

Championed common ground by co-authoring an op-ed with Republican Congressman Erik Paulsen saying, "We are writing as a bipartisan team because there is a critical healthcare issue on which we -- and a growing number of our colleagues -- have found common ground." Top 25% for Official Performance. Member of the Problem Solvers Caucus. "I am working right now to bring together members from both sides. Even on an issue as contentious as health care, in an atmosphere as partisan as D.C., there is common ground to build from." "I will continue to work every day to find solutions in the common ground." "I will continue to seek common ground with all of my colleagues." "Even on an issue as contentious as health care, in an atmosphere as partisan as D.C., we have found this common ground that we can build from."

How do the politicians compare?

Common Ground Score

Maverick Matrix

Balancers
Mavericks
True Believers
Team Players
Constituent Partisan Intensity
Common Ground Score